It wasn’t a total loss, these past days. I was really sick. And kind of winter-brown after the psychological electric-storm. I would like, anyway, to point out the usefulness of writing this each day (and I did do it each day):
They are good for covering the bases of what the violin has to offer. This is easy for a fairly abstract person like me to forget. Sometimes for years at a time. I would like to add, for myself (this is all for myself, no?) that it is useful to give the tip equal attention to the frog. When one plays at the frog, the tip gives a great deal of information, waving around in midair like a semaphore. Thinking of the two gives a better perspective on what happens in-between.
There are a few things to add, too, about Bach, which got a bit of cursory attention, at least:
This has always been one of my favorite movements, I’m not really sure why. I like very much the play between the smooth and skipping rhythms. I’d like to add two background thoughts that came to mind over the past days: 1) slurs occur almost always on stepwise motion, and disconnected dotted rhythms always on leaps — slurs occur in arpeggiated passages only at crucial spots; 2) the Ciaccona bass line is very strong in the first few bars of this movement, perhaps more audibly evident than in any others.
The vibe of this movement remains somewhat mysterious to me, or mysteriously prosaic. Like the other movements, it frames the Ciaccona at its outset, but in a very mildly conversational way… I’ve never really been able to find the dance in it, insofar as it may be a dance — it feels more exploratory, or introductory, or even an entrance-hall sort of fantasia. And partly because of the somewhat irregular arrivals of harmonic events (or so I imagine them, without having looked too closely, at least not for a while), it’s a devil to tune. New keys bring sudden new flavors, and settle quickly, after just a few notes. The ear must prepare to turn on a note, and it is not always easy to decide which one.
- Bach Partita #1 Allemanda — Double
The first question to stop progress through the Allemanda of the first partita comes on the first downbeat: what sort of a little upbeat is this that leads to such a grand consequence? I think the best answer I’ve found comes from making sure that the large first beat gets contrasted with the high-pitched, trilled, second beat. This high-low contrast will justify the scale down in bar two. (Without getting too detailed: what accounts for the change of tune and smoothing articulation in bar 3?) The second question will, I hope, bring progress back: how can one best create a relationship between slurred triplets (which only appear in bar 8, but take over by the end of the movement? I believe this question will bear significant fruit. I haven’t got the answer in my ear yet, though.
Although the Double of the Allemanda is in a different meter (alla breve), and probably should take significantly less time and space, it can of course be superposed, and is useful to hear as comparatively as possible. Its contour is wildly different from the Allemanda — a radically smoothed version of the rather spiky first movement. Although almost no two notes are contiguous, and there are variations in the two-note slur motion, the sense is of an outline or abstraction of an event-filled Allemanda, with a few of its harmonic travels smoothed over as well (see C Major, bar 19, in each).
This is enough to begin, I think.