{"id":351,"date":"2014-02-27T00:51:55","date_gmt":"2014-02-27T07:51:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/?page_id=351"},"modified":"2020-03-16T10:49:23","modified_gmt":"2020-03-16T17:49:23","slug":"brahms-johannes-piano-quartet-in-a-major-op-26","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/?page_id=351","title":{"rendered":"Brahms, Johannes: Op. 26, Piano Quartet in A Major"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Brahms-bar-1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-352\" src=\"http:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/02\/Brahms-bar-1.png\" alt=\"Brahms bar 1\" width=\"252\" height=\"202\" \/><\/a>Rather than talk about biography, which could be rather dry, or sketching out an analysis, which might be rather drier (to read, anyway), it might be interesting to speak about a few details in the A Major Piano Quartet that can open onto broader thoughts about the music of <b>Johannes Brahms<\/b>. In particular, there are a couple items just at the outset with enough potential energy to assure that when things move, they will really move.\u00a0 The first item is the dynamic marking: <i>poco forte <\/i><b>(A)<\/b>. This is a queer cocktail of a dynamic. It seems laced with oxymoron, Italian-as-a-professional-language, a<span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">nd even perhaps a bit of mixed metaphor. Above all, it contains a troublesome and misleading intimation of \u2018littleness\u2019.\u00a0 (Curiously, Brahms was once complemented publicly by King George of Hannover as being a \u2018little Beethoven\u2019, and there is something rather <\/span><i style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">poco forte<\/i><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\"> about that&#8230;) But this is also the dynamic marking of the last movement of the Brahms\u2019 first symphony \u2013 \u2018<\/span><i style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">poco<\/i><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">\u2019 is clearly not the controlling idea here. There is in any case nothing little about the opening of the piano quartet. So what is this <\/span><i style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">poco forte<\/i><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">? How might it be read, played, and given?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The other fruitful detail, also from the first bar, is the simple note-oscillation (B). It\u2019s a tiny bit of music, but full of possibility, instability, and potential for melodic, harmonic, and contrapuntal development. It\u2019s a little thing, this melodic\/harmonic wobble, but it will reappear significantly and memorably in every movement. (Brahms often took such minute musical details and built enormous pieces by mining their musical potential.) Taken together, the elements of <i>poco forte <\/i>and slight oscillation show a powerful desire to grow outward from unity, to unwind potential, and to let music grow as though from an unbroken, or just-broken, seed.\u00a0 The <i>poco forte<\/i> contains intimations of <i>forte<\/i> and <i>fortissimo<\/i> to come, as well as indicating restraint before their occurrence. And the oscillating small intervals show a strong desire for motion from stable (in the singleness of the first beat of the first bar), to unstable (seeking, and not getting, resolution the second bar). There ends up being something very simply declarative in all of it.\u00a0 But the content of what it declares (\u2018in the character of <i>forte<\/i> but with the sound of <i>piano\u2019<\/i>, as Brahms is reputed to have said), contains the seed of a grand construction \u2013 and with that sort of content lying behind it, to make an opening statement \u2018a little strong\u2019 is plenty strong enough.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rather than talk about biography, which could be rather dry, or sketching out an analysis, which might be rather drier (to read, anyway), it might be interesting to speak about a few details in the A Major Piano Quartet that can open onto broader thoughts about the music of Johannes Brahms. In particular, there are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":21,"menu_order":60,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/351"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=351"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/351\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":573,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/351\/revisions\/573"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}