{"id":55,"date":"2008-05-19T21:38:52","date_gmt":"2008-05-19T19:38:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/newtimsummerssite\/?page_id=45"},"modified":"2020-03-15T15:04:14","modified_gmt":"2020-03-15T22:04:14","slug":"mendelssohn-felix-octet-for-strings-in-e-flat-op-20","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/?page_id=55","title":{"rendered":"Mendelssohn, Felix: Octet for Strings in E flat, Op. 20"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Like most composers lucky enough to be known, Richard Wagner got his share of bad notices. One reviewer wrote that Lohengrin was the &#8220;music of a demented eunuch&#8221;; Wagner also earned Mark Twain&#8217;s famous (and pithy) remark that he was a composer who &#8220;wrote music which is better than it sounds.&#8221; But Wagner gave better (that is, worse) than he got, and he did so with more consequence; he deserves little sympathy (moreover, these two critics each made a fair point). Most infamous is his article &#8220;Das Judentum in Musik,&#8221; which the Neue Musikalische Zeitung chose to preface with a remark that it was not the editorial position of the journal in 1850.<\/p>\n<p>Starting with a bit of faint praise for FELIX MENDELSSOHN (whose father had converted to Christianity and whose grandfather was a famous Jewish philosopher and friend to Immanuel Kant), he goes on at some length to describe the reasons for &#8220;the involuntary repellence possessed for us [sic] by the nature and personality of the Jews &#8230; a repugnance still abiding with us in spite of all our Liberal bedazzlements.&#8221; Mendelssohn served well as the first subject for Wagner because his skills were so great, and Wagner could thus proceed with kindness:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>a musician of Jewish birth whom Nature had endowed with specific musical gifts as very few before him&#8230; the early-taken FELIX MENDELSSOHN BARTHOLDY &#8230; has shewn us that a Jew may have the amplest store of specific talents, may own the finest and most varied culture, the highest and the tenderest sense of honour\u00c3\u2018yet without all these pre-eminences helping him, were it but one single time, to call forth in us that deep, that heart-searching effect which we await from Art because we know her capable thereof, because we have felt it many a time and oft, so soon as once a hero of our art has, so to say, but opened his mouth to speak to us.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Others didn&#8221;t get off so easy: &#8220;for no other Jew,&#8221; he writes, &#8220;can we find like sympathy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It is a bit difficult to perform a work of Mendelssohn in the context of such remarks; Wagner&#8217;s criteria are just religious enough in their particulars to be beyond rational or even irrational argument, and one hardly wants to spend time arguing with them or trying to present a counterexample. But the Octet, which Mendelssohn wrote when he was sixteen years old, is spectacular enough to serve as a release if not an answer, so long as one doesn&#8221;t expect to have a religious\/Wagnerian experience. Presenting the Octet against &#8220;Different Trains&#8221; also seemed interesting, as though the complement of eight string players might refill the ghost-space of Reich&#8217;s recorded string quartet, and re-use Reich&#8217;s motoric qualities to re-enlivening effect. Above all, the Octet is music which is at least as good as it sounds, and it sounds like nothing else.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Like most composers lucky enough to be known, Richard Wagner got his share of bad notices. One reviewer wrote that Lohengrin was the &#8220;music of a demented eunuch&#8221;; Wagner also earned Mark Twain&#8217;s famous (and pithy) remark that he was a composer who &#8220;wrote music which is better than it sounds.&#8221; But Wagner gave better [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":21,"menu_order":117,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/55"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=55"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/55\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1291,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/55\/revisions\/1291"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.timsummers.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=55"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}